Skip to main content

Biology and Gender Issues: My 2 Cents

Many years ago, I had a book written by Camille Paglia. I forget the name. I didn't buy it and wasn't that interested in it and didn't finish reading it, largely because the troglodyte who gave it to me had read it first and left CRUMBS in the book.

If my ex-husband ruled the world, that would likely be a hanging offense. Books should be treated better than that.

Anyway, I read enough of it to see her talk about stripping as an art form and her opinion that we don't have male strippers because when men are naked, you can see everything but when a woman is naked, you STILL cannot see her genitals. All you see is a patch of hair. Her genitals remain concealed after she has taken everything off.

Which is a thought-provoking idea that gives a better explanation for "Why do we have female strippers but mostly don't have male strippers?" than your typical assumptions about men having money and power and women being merely sex objects.

I'm a very hetero-passing woman who is 99 percent interested in men. In recent decades, my romantic relationships have been with men.

The vast majority of men do not like me initiating anything, which is sort of amusing because of the number of people who see me as very aggressive and attractive because of it and, yet, they STILL do NOT want me initiating in the vast majority of cases. I've known two men who told me I needed to "ask" and I'm inclined to think both were making up bullshit justifications for their refusal to meet my needs.

Everyone else is completely happy that I am willing to make myself available when they want attention. That works for them.

After much thought, I have concluded that this isn't because "Men have money and power and just treat women as sex objects" or similar stereotypes. I have concluded men don't want me to, say, call them and give them a boner when they are about to go to an important meeting or are walking around in public.

And I have begun to wonder if this detail explains a lot of stereotypical "personality" differences between men and women generally. I have even begun to wonder if the male need to have control over when and where they get all hot bothered -- because it SHOWS on a man more than a woman -- is a root cause of behaviors associated with "assholes with money and power" and if this control-freak tendency helps foster the development of male power rather than the power men tend to have being what fosters "asshole control-freak behaviors."

I am in some ways very traditionally feminine. I'm pretty happy to be accommodating of his quirks and schedule if he's making me happy.

But it's such a consistent pattern that I couldn't help but wonder why and I generally don't much like a lot of our stereotypically "Men are just all assholes" unthinking answers about so-called sexism and other gendered issues. So this is my tentative conclusion on the matter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Anger Management

I was molested and raped as a child. I spent my teens and twenties filled with anger. My therapist once said something like "How did I know you were angry? Maybe it was the flames shooting out your ears." He wasn't actually talking about me. He was describing someone else. But he could have been talking about me. I took up role playing gaming in my teens and my first character was a Red Sonja-esque character with long red tresses. She was a fighter mage and she had issues. Gaming was good for me. I made a lot of friends and they were mostly male and they were protective of me. I began to put down my baggage. At some point, I retired that first character because she was so angry and toxic and I wasn't anymore. Playing her required me to put back on the mantel of so much baggage that I had worked hard to put down and it wasn't good for me to keep that alive. In my late twenties, me and my husband bought a house and it was about thirty minutes from the ...

Terminology, History and Context

From a previous post called The Closet : At one time, I thought that being a "closeted gay" meant something like you slept alone or dated same-sex people secretly. I have come to understand that term differently over the years. I've just left a comment on Reddit in a discussion about the past stating again that at one time I thought closeted meant handling things discreetly but that's not how that word gets used. I did so because of a reply to an earlier  comment of mine where the reply says "We were closeted. To do otherwise meant you'd lose your job." because I talked about the fact that we don't really know how LGBTQ stuff was handled because the written records we have don't really give you a good picture. I initially thought my "weirdo" interpretation of closeted was me being stupid or something but this little exchange has me rethinking that. I'm thinking now that perhaps at one time closeted  was used to mean handling it di...

JK Rowling

As noted by me elsewhere, a lot of people are NOT good at saying "Yes, they are famous, but they are sourcing that info from their ass. Their opinions on THIS subject aren't important." If people were good at that, JK Rowling could not be trolling planet Earth with talking smack about trans issues merely because she's famous. It's been some months since I stated a very mild opinion about JK Rowling's transphobic trolling of planet Earth. My understanding is her shit continues unabated and I'm not okay with that fact. 1. I have a serious medical condition and used to really start shit online without meaning to do so. If she's not merely a thoroughly hateful, evil person, the most charitable guess is she's got a serious medical condition and is trolling planet Earth from her sick bed for entertainment. I was not intentionally shit stirring, was not famous nor influential and I put enormous effort into figuring out how to not be so problematic. I ca...