Skip to main content

Space, Time, Love, Sex

If you go into a romantic relationship, it costs you two friends. Those who have romantic relationships, instead of having the typical five 'core set' of relationships only have four. And of those, one is the new person who's come into their life.
It takes substantial time to establish and maintain a close relationship of any sort. My recollection is that it takes 18 to 20 hours per week to be deeply intimate, like you see with lovers. The above figures suggest that a strong friendship takes around half that much time to establish and maintain.

There are only 24 hours in the day. Most people need at least ten hours a day just for basic life maintenance -- such as sleeping, eating and hygiene -- and most people need to work for pay, which typically accounts for another forty or more hours per week (not counting commute times).

Some people can work two jobs and stay healthy and maintain their sanity, but usually by sacrificing having anything most people would call a life. Others manage to work a full-time paid job while going to school full time, though usually for only a limited period while in thier energetic youth and usually at the cost of their social life.

If you look at both sets of numbers above, it fits with what we know of historical human relationship patterns in a very practical "physics-y" sort of way.

Most human cultures value committed, long-term, monogamous relationships. This makes sense on the face of it for reasons of germ control, purposes of providing for and raising children and other fairly obvious and frequently cited reasons why monogamy is best, which is often presented not as a best pracice but more like a moral edict from on high.

But it also makes sense within the above framework. You can have one lover, three good friends and a full-time job and this provides you a healthy, balanced life in various important metrics.

At least historically, some cultures were fine with a man having both a wife and a mistress, so long as he adequately provided for both and was good to both. This fits in the above framework in that logically it still leaves time for a full-time job and one good friend. It's also reasonably tolerable in terms of issues like germ control (assuming his two lovers are faithful to him), providing for the kids, etc.

Once you go beyond two lovers, it stops making sense. The numbers don't add up. You can't have a truly intimate relationship with three or more lovers and also work a full-time job and have any friends. There simply isn't enough time in the day/week to sustain that.

You sometimes see headlines about some American guy who secretly had three or four wives. If you actually read the article, he temporarily pulled this off by having a job that involved travel and having a different wife in different cities.

You also learn he was deceiving them -- they didn't know they were one of several wives -- and so these were not truly intimate relationships. You have to be honest with someone to have genuine intimacy. It isn't something you can have based on a pack of lies.

In the end, it winds up being a short-term arrangement that typically ends with all the women hating him and law enforcement of some sort wanting to speak with him (because polygamy is not legal in the US).

As stated previously, I think polyamory is real but real polyamory is rare. It's certainly possible to be genuinely intimate with two lovers. Lots of people have done exactly that in human history, if only by having both a wife and mistress.

But the idea that you can really, truly love LOTS of people is pretty much a fiction. You can have an open relationship and you can be honest with a lot of people that "You are not the only one." but most of those relationships will lack the depth necessary to meaningfully apply the word love to them.

Footnote

This post does not cover all use cases and is not intended to do so. There are cultures that allow for multiple spouses -- typically allowing for a man to have multiple wives but not for a woman to have multiple husbands -- and I assume that if you have three or four spouses and all live together, it's possible to spend a lot of time with all of them and know all of them reasonably well.

But I don't really know enough about such to really cover that here. "So don't @ me" as they say on Twitter.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Anger Management

I was molested and raped as a child. I spent my teens and twenties filled with anger. My therapist once said something like "How did I know you were angry? Maybe it was the flames shooting out your ears." He wasn't actually talking about me. He was describing someone else. But he could have been talking about me. I took up role playing gaming in my teens and my first character was a Red Sonja-esque character with long red tresses. She was a fighter mage and she had issues. Gaming was good for me. I made a lot of friends and they were mostly male and they were protective of me. I began to put down my baggage. At some point, I retired that first character because she was so angry and toxic and I wasn't anymore. Playing her required me to put back on the mantel of so much baggage that I had worked hard to put down and it wasn't good for me to keep that alive. In my late twenties, me and my husband bought a house and it was about thirty minutes from the ...

It's a rainy Friday morning here.

To my surprise, this blog already has a whopping four posts dated 2026. This will be the fifth post this year. I thought it was deader than that. I have a lot to say about a lot of topics. It's fueled a bunch of different blogs while I try desperately to both "find my voice" and figure out how to open my mouth in public without undue drama. I've spent years throwing things at a wall and seeing what works. I have several blogs that either gelled after multiple attempts to find my voice, like Native Influence that finally came together earlier this year after multiple tries that got redacted in whole or in part, or blogs that were the umpteenth attempt to make a blog about a concept, like Feminine Character Works replaced a project called Feminist Slacking. I also have a history of giving up on a project and declaring it DEAD, then finally writing buckets. That happened on Project SRO where I did a brain dump of unpolished stuff after announcing "I'm done an...

Another think

And another reason to not REALLY be enthused about continuing to write here: I'm very very very against trying to "cure" people of being gay, but I suspect that some people who think they are gay are really attracted to people who have enough of something in common with them and they just aren't finding it in members of the opposite sex. Some chick on probably Reddit remarked once that she was beginning to worry she liked bad guys and then realized all the bad guys in movies she liked were played by the same actor. She liked that actor in any role he played, bad guy or not. During my divorce, I was involved with a man fourteen years older than me and about the time I was thinking "This is a shit show and I'm NEVER getting with an older man again." I met a guy sixteen years older than me and we really hit it off. I have B.A.G.G.A.G.E about my tendency to like older men. It took me a long time to sort that and not feel like me liking older men somehow was ...