Skip to main content

Intimacy and the Internet

It takes 18 to 20 hours week in and week out to establish and maintain an intimate relationship. You can take the occasional break from that, but if there is a permanent drop off in contact, the relationship quickly begins to die -- or at least changes into something else, something less intimate.

If you do the math, that's between two and three hours daily, but you don't have to have daily contact and you certainly don't need that much daily contact. It's fine to have big chunks of time together on, say, the weekend and lighter amounts of contact on other days.

The internet can facilitate that contact and can facilitate intimacy but it can also confuse people and go weird places and make people imagine they have relationships they don't actually have.

In the past, it was fairly easy to tell who was famous and who wasn't. Famous people made movies or music or did politics and you watched them on TV or whatever and you readily understood that it was a one-way relationship.

The internet means you can interact directly with actual famous people and it also means ordinary people can have lots of followers on social media or blog or what not and this can make it really confusing as to what your relationship is to someone.

Some of their social media followers may be people they actually know in person and have a strong relationship to, such as spouse, coworkers or family. Any casual remarks made on social media between two people who actually know each other IRL will be interpreted by those two individuals through the lens of that context and this may not be obvious to others who know them via social media.

So when you also crack jokes or whatever and you don't have that same context, you may be befuddled as to why they react differently to you than they did to this other person. You may feel rejected or mistreated or frozen out when the reality is they just don't know you and these two relationships are not alike.

When ordinary people post a lot online regularly and yet remain not famous, other people seem to somewhat often interpret their contact with them as being more intimate than it really is. They seem prone to failing to recognize the one-sided nature of the contact.

Instead of feeling like they are talking to Famous Star whom they know of because Fame, they seem to feel like this is more like "My favorite aunt Sally!" -- except Sally may have no idea who you are because you don't share as much about yourself or they simply don't follow all that you share online.

Real and healthy intimacy requires some additional elements to happen:
  • Mutuality
  • Special access to private info
  • Genuine choice

Mutuality

The very definition of fame is that more people can know a lot about the famous person than the famous person can know that well. A million people can read their book or watch their film, but it simply isn't possible for the famous person to devote two hours of their time to knowing something about each of those million people.

If you are spending 18 or more hours per week consuming works by someone online and they are not investing similar amounts of time into getting to know you, you do not have an intimate relationship. At best, you are their fan.

Special access to private info

If all of your contact with someone is with their public comments and public online presence, you do not have an intimate relationship with them. If most of your contact with someone is with their public online presence and you only very occasionally email them or DM them, you do not have an intimate relationship to them.

Some portion of that 18 to 20 hours per week needs to be private and needs to involve sharing things that neither person shares with just anyone and everyone. Interacting only with their public personae doesn't really give you a good idea of who this person really is.

No matter how much they appear to share of themselves, public personaes are typically fairly carefully crafted and there are things people routinely leave out, gloss over and so forth. No matter how much you consume of their public personae, you do not actually know them intimately if that is the only way you know them.

Genuine Choice

If someone has a public presence, to some extent they will end up interacting with people they didn't specifically intend to interact with. They can't hand pick the thousands or millions of people who may consume the content they create.

That means sometimes people they want nothing to do with can stalk them and try to force a feeling of intimacy. If you are trying to force yourself on someone who wants nothing to do with you, no matter how much you manage to learn about them, you do not have some kind of healthy, intimate relationship to them.

They are not your friend or lover. They may well be your victim depending upon how far you take it in terms of forcing yourself onto them and demanding their time and attention.

Giving someone no means to opt out of dealing with you makes you a bad person. If you feel compelled to keep trying to force yourself on someone who doesn't want you in their lives, you need therapy at best and possibly also psych meds.

Dating

If you met them on a dating app, they may not want you to insert yourself into other parts of their online life. Always try to establish if you are welcome in other parts of their online life before joining in. Don't act like you are "entitled" to be there.

If you met them through a public forum where you both participate regularly, I recommend keeping the budding romance part of the relationship on the down low. It helps preserve your options for leaving the relationship without one of you feeling like you must leave the forum.

If you join a forum expressly because your SO is there, don't tell people that's your reason for being there and don't spend most of your time talking with your SO on the forum. Establish your own relationship to the forum, even if you don't participate all that much.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Anger Management

I was molested and raped as a child. I spent my teens and twenties filled with anger. My therapist once said something like "How did I know you were angry? Maybe it was the flames shooting out your ears." He wasn't actually talking about me. He was describing someone else. But he could have been talking about me. I took up role playing gaming in my teens and my first character was a Red Sonja-esque character with long red tresses. She was a fighter mage and she had issues. Gaming was good for me. I made a lot of friends and they were mostly male and they were protective of me. I began to put down my baggage. At some point, I retired that first character because she was so angry and toxic and I wasn't anymore. Playing her required me to put back on the mantel of so much baggage that I had worked hard to put down and it wasn't good for me to keep that alive. In my late twenties, me and my husband bought a house and it was about thirty minutes from the ...

Terminology, History and Context

From a previous post called The Closet : At one time, I thought that being a "closeted gay" meant something like you slept alone or dated same-sex people secretly. I have come to understand that term differently over the years. I've just left a comment on Reddit in a discussion about the past stating again that at one time I thought closeted meant handling things discreetly but that's not how that word gets used. I did so because of a reply to an earlier  comment of mine where the reply says "We were closeted. To do otherwise meant you'd lose your job." because I talked about the fact that we don't really know how LGBTQ stuff was handled because the written records we have don't really give you a good picture. I initially thought my "weirdo" interpretation of closeted was me being stupid or something but this little exchange has me rethinking that. I'm thinking now that perhaps at one time closeted  was used to mean handling it di...

JK Rowling

As noted by me elsewhere, a lot of people are NOT good at saying "Yes, they are famous, but they are sourcing that info from their ass. Their opinions on THIS subject aren't important." If people were good at that, JK Rowling could not be trolling planet Earth with talking smack about trans issues merely because she's famous. It's been some months since I stated a very mild opinion about JK Rowling's transphobic trolling of planet Earth. My understanding is her shit continues unabated and I'm not okay with that fact. 1. I have a serious medical condition and used to really start shit online without meaning to do so. If she's not merely a thoroughly hateful, evil person, the most charitable guess is she's got a serious medical condition and is trolling planet Earth from her sick bed for entertainment. I was not intentionally shit stirring, was not famous nor influential and I put enormous effort into figuring out how to not be so problematic. I ca...